Bitcoin needs to scale and there are many contradicting ideas on how to achieve this.
Sidechains are an inevitable solution. They allow Bitcoins to be transferred from the main blockchain into external blockchains, of which there can be any number with radically different approaches.
In current thinking I have encountered, sidechains are isolated from each other. To move Bitcoin between them would involve a slow transfer back to the mainchain, and then out again to a different sidechain.
Angel is a protocol for addressable blockchains, all using a shared proof of work. It aims to be the Internet of Blockchains (IoB).
Instead of transferring Bitcoin into individual sidechains, you move them into Angel. The Angel blockchain sits at the top of of a tree of blockchains, each of which can have radically different properties, but are all able to transfer Bitcoin and data between each other using a standardised protocol.
Each blockchain has its own address, much like an IP address. The Angel blockchain acts as a registrar, a public record of every blockchain and its properties. Creating a blockchain is as simple as getting a createBlockchain transaction included in an Angel block, with details of parameters such as block creation time, block size limit, etc.
Mining in Angel uses a standardised format, creating hashes which allow all different blockchains to contribute to the same Angel proof of work. Miners must hash the address of the blockchain they are mining, and if they mine a hash of sufficient difficulty for that blockchain they are able to create a block.
Blockchains can have child blockchains, so a child of Angel might have the address aa9, and a child of aa9 might have the address aa9:e4d. The lower down the tree you go, the lower the security, but the lower the transaction fees. If a miner on a lower level produces a hash of sufficient difficulty, they can use it on any parents, up to and including the Angel blockchain, and claim fees on each.
There are so many conflicting visions for how to scale Bitcoin. Angel allows the free market to decide which approaches are successful, and for complementary blockchains with different use cases, such as privacy, or high transaction volume, to more seamlessly exist alongside each other.
I wrote this as a TLDR summary for a (still evolving) idea I had on the best approach to scale Bitcoin infinitely, for more detail please check out my previous article.
photo credit: Colonelbogey71 Angel of the North via photopin (license)
Longtime Bitcoin advocate.
Email [email protected]
Donations welcome: 1H2zNWjxkaVeeE3yX6uVqng5Qoi6gGvYTE
Latest posts by John Hardy (see all)
- The great P2PK Bitcoin heist. Millions of Bitcoins WILL be stolen, but should we even try to stop it? - 24 Aug 2018
- Follow up: Bitcoin Cash has 51% attack vulnerability double jeopardy - 31 Jul 2018
- Bitcoin rival has a major vulnerability which could help Bitcoin miners to destroy it in 2020 - 30 Jul 2018
3 thoughts on “Angel: scaling Bitcoin through an Internet of Blockchains (IoB)”
Hi you can see a similar idea I was trying to move forward last year. Still want to work on this once I have the time. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1083345.0
Hi Andrew, I hadn’t seen that before, interesting discussion, thanks for posting. We’re both clearly on the same page, sidechain trees seems such an effective way to scale.
It will be interesting to see what proposals come up at the Scaling Bitcoin conference next week. Would be great to see such ideas get more attention. Finding time to progress ideas is a problem I share.
I think we have about a year until it becomes important. Segwit and lightning are buying us time, but not much. If there’s anyone funding such development, let me know, then I would apply for a job :).
Comments are closed.